Modern
Gezinti kısmına atla
Arama kısmına atla
(İng. modern) (Ayrıca bknz. modern zamanlar, Modern Çağ, modernite)
Göndermeler[düzenle]
Diğer[düzenle]
|
The term “silk road” thus refers to more than just trade in silk between China and Rome over a few centuries. It stands for the exchanges of things and ideas, both intended and accidental, through trade, diplomacy, conquest, migration, and pilgrimage that intensified integration of the Afro-Eurasian continent from the Neolithic through modern times. Warriors, missionaries, nomads, emissaries, and artisans as well as merchants contributed to this ongoing cross-fertilization, which thrived under imperial and religious unifications. [1] |
| The culture of agrarianate citied society can be characterized as a distinct type in contrast both to the pre-literate types of culture that preceded it and to the Modern technicalistic culture that has followed. In contrast to precitied society —even to agricultural society before the rise of cities— it knew a high degree of social and cultural complexity: a complexity represented not only by the presence of cities (or, occasionally, some organizational equivalent to them), but by writing (or its equivalent for recording), and by all that these imply of possibilities for specialization and large-scale intermingling of differing groups, and for the lively multiplication and development of cumulative cultural traditions. Yet the pace of the seasons set by natural conditions imposed limits on the resources available for cultural elaboration, moreover, any economic or cultural development that did occur, above the level implied in the essentials of the symbiosis of town and land, remained precarious and subject to reversal —in contrast to the conditions of Modern times, of our Technical Age, when agriculture tends to become one 'industry' among others, rather than the primary source of wealth (at least on the level of the world economy as a whole).[2] |
| As innovations accumulated, especially in the West, the result was a qualitative change in the level and kind of human social organization. This shift he likens to that which civilization underwent at Sumer in the emergence of agrarianate citied life. It was this new cultural attitude, and not industrialization, which was the hallmark of the modern age. (Denmark, he explains, is indubitably modern, yet predominantly agricultural.)[3] |
| I shared the evolving arguments of the so-called dependistas like Samir Amin and Andre Gunder Frank that the "traditional" was as recent as the "modern," that the two emerged in tandem, so that we could speak, in Frank's famous phrase, of "the development of underdevelopment."[4] |
| the traditional liberal theoretical analysis of modernity broke modern life down into three spheres — the economic, the political, and the sociocultural. This was reflected in the creation of three separate social science disciplines dealing with the modern world: economics, concerned with the market; political science, concerned with the state; and sociology, concerned with everything else (sometimes called the civil society).[5] |
Notlar[düzenle]
- ↑ Millward, James A. (2013). The Silk Road. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. s. 28.
- ↑ Hodgson, Marshall G. S. (2009). The Venture of Islam, Volume 1. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. s. 108.
- ↑ Burke III, Edmund (2002). "Introduction: Marshall G. S. Hodgson and world history". MARSHALL G. S. HODGSON Rethinking world history içinde. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. s. xx.
- ↑ Wallerstein, Immanuel (2011). The Modern World-System I. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University od California Press. s.
- ↑ Wallerstein, Immanuel (2011). The Modern World-System I. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University od California Press. s.xxii