"Buluş" sayfasının sürümleri arasındaki fark
Gezinti kısmına atla
Arama kısmına atla
("(İng. ''invention'') ==Göndermeler== ===Diğer=== {{:Burke 000004}} ==Notlar == <references/>" içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu) |
k |
||
| 3. satır: | 3. satır: | ||
===Diğer=== | ===Diğer=== | ||
{{:Burke 000004}} | {{:Burke 000004}} | ||
| + | {{:Woolmer_000043}} | ||
==Notlar == | ==Notlar == | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
| + | [[Category:Fenike]] | ||
11.16, 19 Ekim 2021 itibarı ile sayfanın şu anki hâli
(İng. invention)
Göndermeler[düzenle]
Diğer[düzenle]
| An important aspect of Hodgson's reevaluation of modernity is his insistence that in historical time it is the discontinuities and not the continuities of Western history which are most striking. He notes that the ascending curve which runs from ancient Greece, to the Renaissance, to modern times is an optical illusion. In fact, he argues, for most of history Europe was an insignificant outlier of mainland Asia. Furthermore, he notes, the Renaissance did not inaugurate modernity. Instead, it brought Europe up to the cultural level of the other major civilizations of the Oikoumene. It did so in some measure by assimilating the advances of the other Asian civilizations. The list of inventions which developed elsewhere and diffused subsequently to Europe is a long one. It includes gunpowder firearms, the compass, the sternpost rudder, decimal notation, and the university, among others. Seen in this light, the European experience looks much less original. This is not to deny that there were original European developments. But in the context of three millennia of agrarianate citied life in the Afro-Eurasian Oikoumene, there was a tendency for civilizations to achieve a rough parity with one another as cultural innovations diffused throughout the Oikoumene.[1] |
| Although archaeology has shown that Pliny was wrong to attribute the invention of glass to the Phoenicians, as it first appears in the Hurrian kingdom of Mitanni in the sixteenth century, the material and literary records pertaining to the Late Bronze and Early Iron Age indicate that he was right to allude to the long history of glassmaking in Phoenicia.[2] |