"Politik" sayfasının sürümleri arasındaki fark
Gezinti kısmına atla
Arama kısmına atla
k |
k |
||
| 4. satır: | 4. satır: | ||
{{:Woolmer_000009}} | {{:Woolmer_000009}} | ||
{{:Woolmer_000010}} | {{:Woolmer_000010}} | ||
| + | {{:Woolmer_000011}} | ||
==Notlar == | ==Notlar == | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Fenike]] | [[Category:Fenike]] | ||
14.22, 17 Ekim 2021 tarihindeki hâli
(İng. political)
Göndermeler
Diğer
| Persia’s hegemony over Mesopotamia, Egypt and the Levant brought political stability, whilst its efficient communications networks and infrastructures, such as the great Royal Highway, helped facilitate trade (Herodotus 5.52–4).[1] |
| Furthermore, unlike their Canaanite, Egyptian, Assyrian and Persian counterparts, Phoenician monarchs did not, as far as is known, recount their exploits and political endeavours in monumental commemorative inscriptions or reliefs.[2] |
| Hiram I, for instance, expressed his personal authority and aspirations through the construction of a lavish new royal palace, a decision that is indicative of a ruler who wields considerable power (in democracies, oligarchies, or in states ruled by a more limited form of monarchy, political statements were more typically made through the construction of communal amenities such as markets, harbours and fortifications)[3] |
Notlar
- ↑ Woolmer, Mark (2002). A Short History of the Phoenicians. London, New York: I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd. s. 48.
- ↑ Woolmer, Mark (2002). A Short History of the Phoenicians. London, New York: I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd. s. 56.
- ↑ Woolmer, Mark (2002). A Short History of the Phoenicians. London, New York: I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd. s. 57.