"Woolmer 000012" sayfasının sürümleri arasındaki fark
Gezinti kısmına atla
Arama kısmına atla
("{| border="1" |- |Comparisons between the political activities of Phoenician kings and those undertaken by their Near Eastern counterparts reveal little diffe..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu) |
k |
||
| 1. satır: | 1. satır: | ||
{| border="1" | {| border="1" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |In many Near Eastern cultures, kingship was considered to be the very basis of civilisation. According to such beliefs, it was only the uncivilised which lived without a king to provide them with security, freedom, peace, prosperity and justice.<ref>{{:RefWoolmer001}} s. 57.</ref> |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
14.13, 16 Ekim 2021 tarihindeki hâli
| In many Near Eastern cultures, kingship was considered to be the very basis of civilisation. According to such beliefs, it was only the uncivilised which lived without a king to provide them with security, freedom, peace, prosperity and justice.[1] |
- ↑ Woolmer, Mark (2002). A Short History of the Phoenicians. London, New York: I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd. s. 57.