"Politik" sayfasının sürümleri arasındaki fark
Gezinti kısmına atla
Arama kısmına atla
k |
k |
||
| (Aynı kullanıcının aradaki bir diğer değişikliği gösterilmiyor) | |||
| 5. satır: | 5. satır: | ||
{{:Woolmer_000010}} | {{:Woolmer_000010}} | ||
{{:Woolmer_000011}} | {{:Woolmer_000011}} | ||
| + | {{:Woolmer_000013}} | ||
| + | {{:Wallerstein 000004}} | ||
==Notlar == | ==Notlar == | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Fenike]] | [[Category:Fenike]] | ||
05.54, 27 Ekim 2021 itibarı ile sayfanın şu anki hâli
(İng. political)
Göndermeler[düzenle]
Diğer[düzenle]
| Persia’s hegemony over Mesopotamia, Egypt and the Levant brought political stability, whilst its efficient communications networks and infrastructures, such as the great Royal Highway, helped facilitate trade (Herodotus 5.52–4).[1] |
| Furthermore, unlike their Canaanite, Egyptian, Assyrian and Persian counterparts, Phoenician monarchs did not, as far as is known, recount their exploits and political endeavours in monumental commemorative inscriptions or reliefs.[2] |
| Hiram I, for instance, expressed his personal authority and aspirations through the construction of a lavish new royal palace, a decision that is indicative of a ruler who wields considerable power (in democracies, oligarchies, or in states ruled by a more limited form of monarchy, political statements were more typically made through the construction of communal amenities such as markets, harbours and fortifications)[3] |
| Comparisons between the political activities of Phoenician kings and those undertaken by their Near Eastern counterparts reveal little difference in the patterns of thought and behaviour and thus there can be little doubt that Phoenician royal ideologies were inspired and influenced by Mesopotamian and Canaanite traditions.[4] |
| the traditional liberal theoretical analysis of modernity broke modern life down into three spheres — the economic, the political, and the sociocultural. This was reflected in the creation of three separate social science disciplines dealing with the modern world: economics, concerned with the market; political science, concerned with the state; and sociology, concerned with everything else (sometimes called the civil society).[5] |
Notlar[düzenle]
- ↑ Woolmer, Mark (2002). A Short History of the Phoenicians. London, New York: I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd. s. 48.
- ↑ Woolmer, Mark (2002). A Short History of the Phoenicians. London, New York: I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd. s. 56.
- ↑ Woolmer, Mark (2002). A Short History of the Phoenicians. London, New York: I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd. s. 57.
- ↑ Woolmer, Mark (2002). A Short History of the Phoenicians. London, New York: I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd. s. 57.
- ↑ Wallerstein, Immanuel (2011). The Modern World-System I. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University od California Press. s.xxii