"İnsani" sayfasının sürümleri arasındaki fark
Gezinti kısmına atla
Arama kısmına atla
k |
k |
||
| (Aynı kullanıcının aradaki diğer 2 değişikliği gösterilmiyor) | |||
| 4. satır: | 4. satır: | ||
{{:Burke 000005}} | {{:Burke 000005}} | ||
{{:Woolmer_000004}} | {{:Woolmer_000004}} | ||
| + | {{:Dedui Levinson 000001}} | ||
| + | {{:Dedui Levinson 000002}} | ||
| + | {{:Dedui Levinson 000011}} | ||
==Notlar== | ==Notlar== | ||
<references/> | <references/> | ||
[[Category:Fenike]] | [[Category:Fenike]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Dil]] | ||
06.58, 21 Ekim 2021 itibarı ile sayfanın şu anki hâli
(İng. human)
Göndermeler[düzenle]
Diğer[düzenle]
| As innovations accumulated, especially in the West, the result was a qualitative change in the level and kind of human social organization. This shift he likens to that which civilization underwent at Sumer in the emergence of agrarianate citied life. It was this new cultural attitude, and not industrialization, which was the hallmark of the modern age. (Denmark, he explains, is indubitably modern, yet predominantly agricultural.)[1] |
| Although the region of the Levant which became known as Phoenicia has a long history of human occupation which dates back at least as far as the tenth millennium BCE, scholars are generally of the opinion that it was during the Early Iron Age, in around 1200 BCE , that the Phoenicians first emerged as a distinct cultural entity.[2] |
| This paper argues for a much greater antiquity of human language than has normally been assumed in the language sciences.[3] |
| In this paper we briefly review several recent lines of evidence concerning Neandertal language and speech capacity, aiming to dispel the idea —still held in some influential circles— that the Neandertals were an inarticulate not quite human species, arguing instead that they were probably not very different biologically or cognitively from us, and that their linguistic capacities were closely similar to our own.[4] |
| But human culture is a spiral which under the right conditions will simply ratchet up. The right conditions are time left over from subsistence activities, strong norms of parental investment in the young, relative health, sufficient peer competition, ecological wealth for conspicuous consumption, etc.These enabling conditions have to be met, and then incremental cultural transmission will do the rest.[5] |
Notlar[düzenle]
- ↑ Burke III, Edmund (2002). "Introduction: Marshall G. S. Hodgson and world history". MARSHALL G. S. HODGSON Rethinking world history içinde. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. s. xx.
- ↑ Woolmer, Mark (2002). A Short History of the Phoenicians. London, New York: I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd. s. 22.
- ↑ Dediu, Dan and Stephen C. Levinson (2013). "On the antiquity of language: The reinterpretation of Neandertal linguistic capacities and its consequences". in Frontiers in Language Sciences, 4: 397. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00397. s. 1.
- ↑ Dediu, Dan and Stephen C. Levinson (2013). "On the antiquity of language: The reinterpretation of Neandertal linguistic capacities and its consequences". in Frontiers in Language Sciences, 4: 397. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00397. s.1
- ↑ Dediu, Dan and Stephen C. Levinson (2013). "On the antiquity of language: The reinterpretation of Neandertal linguistic capacities and its consequences". in Frontiers in Language Sciences, 4: 397. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00397. s.9