"Woolmer 000012" sayfasının sürümleri arasındaki fark

14.30, 17 Ekim 2021 itibarı ile sayfanın şu anki hâli

In many Near Eastern cultures, kingship was considered to be the very basis of civilisation. According to such beliefs, it was only the uncivilised which lived without a king to provide them with security, freedom, peace, prosperity and justice.^[1]

↑ Woolmer, Mark (2002). A Short History of the Phoenicians. London, New York: I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd. s. 57.

@@ 1. satır: / 1. satır: @@
 {| border="1"
 |-
-|Comparisons between the political activities of Phoenician kings and those undertaken by their Near Eastern counterparts reveal little difference in the patterns of thought and behaviour and thus there can be little doubt that Phoenician royal ideologies were inspired and influenced by Mesopotamian and Canaanite traditions.<ref>{{:RefWoolmer001}} s. 57.</ref>
+|In many [[Near East]]ern [[culture]]s, [[kingship]] was considered to be the very basis of [[civilisation]]. According to such [[belief]]s, it was only the [[uncivilised]] which [[live]]d without a [[king]] to provide them with [[security]], [[freedom]], [[peace]], [[prosperity]] and [[justice]].<ref>{{:RefWoolmer001}} s. 57.</ref>
 |-
 |}