"Modernite" sayfasının sürümleri arasındaki fark

DrOS'un not defteri sitesinden
Gezinti kısmına atla Arama kısmına atla
("==Göndermeler== ===Diğer=== {{:Burke 000004}} ==Notlar == <references/>" içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu)
 
k
 
(Aynı kullanıcının aradaki bir diğer değişikliği gösterilmiyor)
1. satır: 1. satır:
 +
(İng. ''modernity'')
 +
(Ayrıca bknz. [[modern]], [[modern zamanlar]], [[Modern Çağ]])
 
==Göndermeler==
 
==Göndermeler==
 
===Diğer===
 
===Diğer===
 
{{:Burke 000004}}
 
{{:Burke 000004}}
 +
{{:Wallerstein 000004}}
 
==Notlar ==
 
==Notlar ==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>

05.53, 27 Ekim 2021 itibarı ile sayfanın şu anki hâli

(İng. modernity) (Ayrıca bknz. modern, modern zamanlar, Modern Çağ)

Göndermeler[düzenle]

Diğer[düzenle]

An important aspect of Hodgson's reevaluation of modernity is his insistence that in historical time it is the discontinuities and not the continuities of Western history which are most striking. He notes that the ascending curve which runs from ancient Greece, to the Renaissance, to modern times is an optical illusion. In fact, he argues, for most of history Europe was an insignificant outlier of mainland Asia. Furthermore, he notes, the Renaissance did not inaugurate modernity. Instead, it brought Europe up to the cultural level of the other major civilizations of the Oikoumene. It did so in some measure by assimilating the advances of the other Asian civilizations. The list of inventions which developed elsewhere and diffused subsequently to Europe is a long one. It includes gunpowder firearms, the compass, the sternpost rudder, decimal notation, and the university, among others. Seen in this light, the European experience looks much less original. This is not to deny that there were original European developments. But in the context of three millennia of agrarianate citied life in the Afro-Eurasian Oikoumene, there was a tendency for civilizations to achieve a rough parity with one another as cultural innovations diffused throughout the Oikoumene.[1]
the traditional liberal theoretical analysis of modernity broke modern life down into three spheres — the economic, the political, and the sociocultural. This was reflected in the creation of three separate social science disciplines dealing with the modern world: economics, concerned with the market; political science, concerned with the state; and sociology, concerned with everything else (sometimes called the civil society).[2]

Notlar[düzenle]

  1. Burke III, Edmund (2002). "Introduction: Marshall G. S. Hodgson and world history". MARSHALL G. S. HODGSON Rethinking world history içinde. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. s. xix-xx.
  2. Wallerstein, Immanuel (2011). The Modern World-System I. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University od California Press. s.xxii