"Woolmer 000037" sayfasının sürümleri arasındaki fark
Gezinti kısmına atla
Arama kısmına atla
("{| border="1" |- |Significantly, as evinced in ''De Dea Syria'', the Phoenician cities still showed signs of religious autonomy in the second century CE despi..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu) |
k |
||
| (Aynı kullanıcının aradaki bir diğer değişikliği gösterilmiyor) | |||
| 1. satır: | 1. satır: | ||
{| border="1" | {| border="1" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |Significantly, as evinced in ''De Dea Syria'', the Phoenician | + | |Significantly, as evinced in ''De Dea Syria'', the [[Phoenician]] [[city|citie]]s still showed signs of [[religious]] [[autonomy]] in the second century CE despite all of the inducements towards [[syncretism]] which had been offered firstly by [[Hellenisation]] and then by [[Romanisation]].<ref>{{:RefWoolmer001}} s. 108.</ref> |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
09.05, 19 Ekim 2021 itibarı ile sayfanın şu anki hâli
| Significantly, as evinced in De Dea Syria, the Phoenician cities still showed signs of religious autonomy in the second century CE despite all of the inducements towards syncretism which had been offered firstly by Hellenisation and then by Romanisation.[1] |
- ↑ Woolmer, Mark (2002). A Short History of the Phoenicians. London, New York: I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd. s. 108.