"Woolmer 000001" sayfasının sürümleri arasındaki fark
Gezinti kısmına atla
Arama kısmına atla
k |
k |
||
| 1. satır: | 1. satır: | ||
{| border="1" | {| border="1" | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |Furthermore, in contrast to [[Greece]], where civic identities could be subsumed into wider regional ones (for instance, [[citizen]]s of {{Athen]]s could define themselves by their deme, city or nationality – e.g. Archarnian, [[Athenian]], [[Greek]]), in [[Phoenicia]] there was no concept of a common or shared [[identity]] beyond the level of the [[city state]].<ref>{{:RefWoolmer001}} s. 4.</ref> | + | |Furthermore, in contrast to [[Greece]], where civic identities could be subsumed into wider regional ones (for instance, [[citizen]]s of {{Athen]]s could define themselves by their deme, city or nationality – e.g. Archarnian, [[Athenian]], [[Greek]]), in [[Phoenicia]] there was no concept of a common or shared [[identity]] beyond the level of the [[city-state|city state]].<ref>{{:RefWoolmer001}} s. 4.</ref> |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
09.02, 17 Ekim 2021 tarihindeki hâli
| Furthermore, in contrast to Greece, where civic identities could be subsumed into wider regional ones (for instance, citizens of {{Athen]]s could define themselves by their deme, city or nationality – e.g. Archarnian, Athenian, Greek), in Phoenicia there was no concept of a common or shared identity beyond the level of the city state.[1] |
- ↑ Woolmer, Mark (2002). A Short History of the Phoenicians. London, New York: I.B.Tauris & Co. Ltd. s. 4.