"Dietz 000001" sayfasının sürümleri arasındaki fark
Gezinti kısmına atla
Arama kısmına atla
k |
k |
||
| 2. satır: | 2. satır: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
| − | The political nature of Stagira’s “place” is equally ambiguous. Mogens H. Hansen (1995, 75) describes it as “the borderland” between city-state and municipality, an entity that transgresses conventional (oppositional) principles of territorial identification, bearing characteristics of both an independent entity (polis) in Hellas and a dependent entity (kömē) associated with barbarian habitations in Macedon.<ref>{{:RefDietz001}}. p.278</ref> | + | The political nature of Stagira’s “place” is equally ambiguous. Mogens H. Hansen (1995, 75) describes it as “the borderland” between city-state and municipality, an entity that transgresses conventional (oppositional) principles of territorial identification, bearing characteristics of both an independent entity (''polis'') in Hellas and a dependent entity (''kömē'') associated with barbarian habitations in Macedon.<ref>{{:RefDietz001}}. p.278</ref>o̅ |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
07.49, 21 Eylül 2021 tarihindeki hâli
|
The political nature of Stagira’s “place” is equally ambiguous. Mogens H. Hansen (1995, 75) describes it as “the borderland” between city-state and municipality, an entity that transgresses conventional (oppositional) principles of territorial identification, bearing characteristics of both an independent entity (polis) in Hellas and a dependent entity (kömē) associated with barbarian habitations in Macedon.[1]o̅ |
- ↑ Dietz, Mary G. (2012). "Between Polis and Empire: Aristotle's Politics". The American Political Science Review, May 2012, Vol. 106, No. 2 (May 2012), pp. 275-293. p.278