Millward 000002 - Revizyon geçmişi

Osman 07.22, 24 Eylül 2021 tarihinde

2021-09-24T07:22:59Z

Osman 07.02, 24 Eylül 2021 tarihinde

2021-09-24T07:02:04Z

Osman: "{| border="1" |- |In the 1930s, the social scientist Frederick Teggart looked at the Eurasian connections between Roma|Ro..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

2021-09-24T07:01:45Z

"{| border="1" |- |In the 1930s, the social scientist Frederick Teggart looked at the Eurasian connections between Roma|Ro..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

Yeni sayfa

{| border="1"
|-
|In the 1930s, the social scientist [[Teggart, Frederick|Frederick Teggart]] looked at the [[Avrasya|Eurasian]] connections between [[Roma|Rome]] and [[Çin|Han]] and their shared problem with “[[barbar]]ians” on the frontiers; he wrote a book attempting to explain what he saw as correlations between [[doğulu|Eastern]] and [[batılı||Western]] [[tarih|history]]. Wars in the Roman east and barbarian invasions along the Danube and Rhine were ultimately the result, Teggart argued, of policies of the Han government. How? Through trade and nomadic migrations. Wars in the Tarim Basin disrupted trade that would have passed through Parthia, which in turn made trouble on the eastern Roman frontier in Armenia. Likewise, Han policies to split the Xiongnu set tribes in motion across the steppe to Russia, who in turn drove other “barbarian” tribes before them, right up to the Roman northern frontier in Europe.<ref>{{:RefMillward001}} s. 32.</ref>
|-
|}

@@ 1. satır: / 1. satır: @@
 {| border="1"
 |-
-|In the 1930s, the social scientist [[Teggart, Frederick|Frederick Teggart]] looked at the [[Avrasya|Eurasian]] connections between [[Roma|Rome]] and [[Çin|Han]] and their shared problem with “[[barbar]]ians” on the frontiers; he wrote a book attempting to explain what he saw as correlations between [[doğulu|Eastern]] and [[batılı|Western]] [[tarih|history]]. Wars in the Roman east and barbarian invasions along the Danube and Rhine were ultimately the result, Teggart argued, of policies of the Han government. How? Through trade and nomadic migrations. Wars in the Tarim Basin disrupted trade that would have passed through Parthia, which in turn made trouble on the eastern Roman frontier in Armenia. Likewise, Han policies to split the Xiongnu set tribes in motion across the steppe to Russia, who in turn drove other “barbarian” tribes before them, right up to the Roman northern frontier in Europe.<ref>{{:RefMillward001}} s. 32.</ref>
+|In the 1930s, the social scientist [[Teggart, Frederick|Frederick Teggart]] looked at the [[Avrasya|Eurasian]] connections between [[Roma|Rome]] and [[Han Hanedanlığı|Han]] and their shared problem with “[[barbar]]ians” on the frontiers; he wrote a book attempting to explain what he saw as correlations between [[doğulu|Eastern]] and [[batılı|Western]] [[tarih|history]]. Wars in the [[Romalı|Roman]] east and [[barbar]]ian invasions along the [[Tuna|Danube]] and [[Ren|Rhine]] were ultimately the result, [[Teggart, Frederick|Teggart]] argued, of policies of the [[Han Hanedanlığı|Han]] government. How? Through [[ticaret|trade]] and [[göçebe|nomadic]] [[göç|migrations]]. [[Savaş|War]]s in the [[Tarım Havzası|Tarim Basin]] disrupted [[ticaret|trade]] that would have passed through [[Part İmparatorluğu|Parthia]], which in turn made trouble on the eastern [[Roma]]n frontier in [[Ermenistan|Armenia]]. Likewise, Han policies to split the [[Hun|Xiongnu]] set tribes in motion across the steppe to [[Rusya|Russia]], who in turn drove other “[[barbar]]ian” tribes before them, right up to the [[Roma]]n northern frontier in [[Avrupa|Europe]].<ref>{{:RefMillward001}} s. 32.</ref>
 |-
 |}