Hodgson 000004 - Revizyon geçmişi

Osman 08.45, 3 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-03T08:45:25Z

Osman 08.29, 3 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-03T08:29:18Z

Osman 08.11, 3 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-03T08:11:49Z

Osman: "{| border="1" |- |The culture of agrarianate citied society can be characterized as a distinct type in contrast both to the pre-literate types of culture that..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

2021-10-02T10:38:30Z

"{| border="1" |- |The culture of agrarianate citied society can be characterized as a distinct type in contrast both to the pre-literate types of culture that..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

Yeni sayfa

{| border="1"
|-
|The culture of agrarianate citied society can be characterized as a distinct type in contrast both to the pre-literate types of culture that preceded it and to the Modern technicalistic culture that has followed. In contrast to precitied society—even to agricultural society before the rise of cities—it knew a high degree of social and cultural complexity: a complexity represented not only by the presence of cities (or, occasionally, some organizational equivalent to them), but by writing (or its equivalent for recording), and by all that these imply of possibilities for specialization and large-scale intermingling of differing groups, and for the lively multiplication and development of cumulative cultural traditions. Yet the pace of the seasons set by natural conditions imposed limits on the resources available for cultural elaboration, moreover, any economic or cultural development that did occur, above the level implied in the essentials of the symbiosis of town and land, remained precarious and subject to reversal—in contrast to the conditions of Modern times, of our Technical Age, when agriculture tends to become one 'industry' among others, rather than the primary source of wealth (at least on the level of the world economy as a whole).<ref>{{:RefHodgson001}} s. 108.</ref>
|-
|}

@@ 1. satır: / 1. satır: @@
 {| border="1"
 |-
-|The [[culture]] of [[agrarianate citied society]] can be characterized as a distinct type in contrast both to the [[pre-literate]] types of [[culture]] that preceded it and to the [[Modern]] [[technicalistic]] [[culture]] that has followed. In contrast to [[precitied]] [[society]] —even to [[agricultural society]] before the rise of [[city|cities]]— it knew a high degree of [[social]] and [[cultural]] [[complexity]]: a [[complexity]] represented not only by the presence of [[city|cities]] (or, occasionally, some organizational equivalent to them), but by writing (or its equivalent for recording), and by all that these imply of possibilities for specialization and large-scale intermingling of differing [[group]]s, and for the lively multiplication and development of [[cumulative]] [[cultural]] [[tradition]]s. Yet the pace of the [[season]]s set by [[natural]] [[condition]]s imposed [[limit]]s on the [[resource]]s available for [[cultural]] [[elaboration]], moreover, any [[economic]] or [[cultural]] [[development]] that did occur, above the level implied in the essentials of the [[symbiosis]] of [[town]] and [[kır|land]], remained precarious and subject to reversal —in contrast to the [[condition]]s of [[Modern times]], of our [[Technical Age]], when [[agriculture]] tends to become one '[[Industry|industry]]' among others, rather than the [[primary]] [[source]] of [[wealth]] (at least on the level of the [[world economy]] [[as a whole]]).<ref>{{:RefHodgson001}} s. 108.</ref>
+|The [[culture]] of [[agrarianate citied society]] can be characterized as a distinct type in contrast both to the [[pre-literate]] types of [[culture]] that preceded it and to the [[Modern]] [[technicalistic]] [[culture]] that has followed. In contrast to [[precitied]] [[society]] —even to [[agricultural society]] before the rise of [[city|cities]]— it knew a high degree of [[social]] and [[cultural]] [[complexity]]: a [[complexity]] represented not only by the presence of [[city|cities]] (or, occasionally, some organizational equivalent to them), but by [[writing]] (or its equivalent for [[recording]]), and by all that these imply of possibilities for specialization and large-scale intermingling of differing [[group]]s, and for the lively multiplication and development of [[cumulative]] [[cultural]] [[tradition]]s. Yet the pace of the [[season]]s set by [[natural]] [[condition]]s imposed [[limit]]s on the [[resource]]s available for [[cultural]] [[elaboration]], moreover, any [[economic]] or [[cultural]] [[development]] that did occur, above the level implied in the essentials of the [[symbiosis]] of [[town]] and [[kır|land]], remained precarious and subject to reversal —in contrast to the [[condition]]s of [[Modern times]], of our [[Technical Age]], when [[agriculture]] tends to become one '[[Industry|industry]]' among others, rather than the [[primary]] [[source]] of [[wealth]] (at least on the level of the [[world economy]] [[as a whole]]).<ref>{{:RefHodgson001}} s. 108.</ref>
 |-
 |}