Hodgson 000003 - Revizyon geçmişi

Osman 07.53, 3 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-03T07:53:20Z

Osman 07.50, 3 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-03T07:50:15Z

Osman 07.44, 3 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-03T07:44:10Z

Osman 11.09, 2 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-02T11:09:45Z

Osman: "{| border="1" |- |We shall use the phrases 'agrarianate' society or culture to refer not just to the agrarian sector and the agrarian institutions immediately..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

2021-10-02T10:37:12Z

"{| border="1" |- |We shall use the phrases 'agrarianate' society or culture to refer not just to the agrarian sector and the agrarian institutions immediately..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

Yeni sayfa

{| border="1"
|-
|We shall use the phrases 'agrarianate' society or culture to refer not just to the agrarian sector and the agrarian institutions immediately based on it, but to the whole level of cultural complexity in which agrarian relations were characteristically crucial, which prevailed in citied societies between the first advent of citied life and the technicalizing transformations of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. The term 'agrarianate', in contrast to 'agrarian', then, will refer not only to the agrarian society itself but to all the forms of society even indirectly dependent on it—including that of mercantile cities and of pastoral tribesmen. The crucial point was that the society had reached a level of complexity associated with urban dominance—in this sense, it was 'urbanized'—but the urban dominance was itself based, directly or indirectly, primarily on agrarian resources which were developed on the level of manual power: based on them not in the sense that all must eat but that (since most production was agricultural) the income of crucial classes was derived from their relation to the land.<ref>{{:RefHodgson001}} s. 107-108.</ref>
|-
|}

@@ 1. satır: / 1. satır: @@
 {| border="1"
 |-
-|We shall use the phrases '[[agrarianate]]' [[society]] or [[culture]] to refer not just to the [[agrarian sector]] and the [[agrarian]] [[institution]]s immediately based on it, but to the whole level of [[cultural]] [[complexity]] in which [[agrarian]] [[relation]]s were characteristically crucial, which prevailed in [[citied]] [[society|societ]]ies between the first advent of [[citied]] [[life]] and the [[technicalize|technicaliz]]ing [[transformation]]s of the [[17th century|seventeenth]] and [[18th century|eighteenth centur]]ies. The term '[[agrarianate]]', in contrast to '[[agrarian]]', then, will refer not only to the [[agrarian society]] itself but to all the [[forms of society]] even indirectly dependent on it —including that of [[mercantile city|mercantile cit]]ies and of [[pastoral]] [[tribe]]smen. The crucial point was that the [[society]] had reached a ''level of [[complexity]] associated with [[urban]] [[dominance]]'' —in this sense, it was '[[urbanized]]'— but the [[urban dominance]] was itself ''based, directly or indirectly, primarily on [[agrarian]] [[resource]]s'' which were developed on the level of manual [[power]]: based on them not in the sense that all must [[eat]] but that (since most [[production]] was [[agricultural]]) the [[income]] of crucial [[class]]es was derived from their [[relation]] to the [[land]].<ref>{{:RefHodgson001}} s. 107-108.</ref>
+|We shall use the phrases '[[agrarianate]]' [[society]] or [[culture]] to refer not just to the [[agrarian sector]] and the [[agrarian]] [[institution]]s immediately based on it, but to the whole level of [[cultural]] [[complexity]] in which [[agrarian]] [[relation]]s were characteristically crucial, which prevailed in [[citied]] [[society|societ]]ies between the first advent of [[citied]] [[life]] and the [[technicalize|technicaliz]]ing [[transformation]]s of the [[17th century|seventeenth]] and [[18th century|eighteenth centur]]ies. The term '[[agrarianate]]', in contrast to '[[agrarian]]', then, will refer not only to the [[agrarian society]] itself but to all the [[forms of society]] even indirectly dependent on it —including that of [[mercantile city|mercantile cit]]ies and of [[pastoral]] [[tribe]]smen. The crucial point was that the [[society]] had reached a ''level of [[complexity]] associated with [[urban]] [[dominance]]'' —in this sense, it was '[[urbanized]]'— but the [[urban dominance]] was itself ''based, directly or indirectly, primarily on [[agrarian]] [[resource]]s'' which were developed on the level of manual [[power]]: based on them not in the sense that all must [[eat]] but that (since most [[production]] was [[agricultural]]) the [[Income|income]] of crucial [[class]]es was derived from their [[relation]] to the [[land]].<ref>{{:RefHodgson001}} s. 107-108.</ref>
 |-
 |}