Hodgson 000002 - Revizyon geçmişi

Osman 06.19, 3 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-03T06:19:41Z

Osman 06.13, 3 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-03T06:13:27Z

Osman 13.54, 2 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-02T13:54:34Z

Osman 11.08, 2 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-02T11:08:04Z

Osman 10.21, 2 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-02T10:21:37Z

Osman 10.20, 2 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-02T10:20:53Z

Osman: "{| border="1" |-All three foci of high culture depended on the condition of agriculture. The basis of temple and court was agrarian in that their wealth and p..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

2021-10-02T10:20:43Z

"{| border="1" |-All three foci of high culture depended on the condition of agriculture. The basis of temple and court was agrarian in that their wealth and p..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

Yeni sayfa

{| border="1"
|-All three foci of high culture depended on the condition of agriculture. The basis of temple and court was agrarian in that their wealth and power presupposed chiefly arrangements concerning agricultural production. The market depended on agriculture less directly than did temple or court, for the traders brought goods from afar subject to other hazards than that of the local weather, and (provided there were sufficient stored savings) sold their goods in lean years as in fat. Yet, in the long run, the merchants too depended on the state of agriculture and their profits presupposed the peasants' surplus. Even when, as in Syria, mercantile city-states arose which depended primarily on distant trading by sea and land, their trade depended so intimately on the agrarian societies about them that both morally and materially they too lived ultimately from the peasants. Even the pastoralists, including the desert nomads, who depended on the agriculturists for much of their food and goods, were part of the same social complex. Accordingly, the type of social order which was introduced into the agricultural regions (and the areas dependent on them) with the rise of cities may be called agrarian-based or (to be more comprehensive) agrarianate citied society. (I say citied', not 'urban', because the society included the peasants, who were not urban though their life reflected the presence of cities.)|<ref>{{:RefHodgson001}} s. 107.</ref>
|-
|}

@@ 1. satır: / 1. satır: @@
 {| border="1"
 |-
-|All three foci of [[high culture]] depended on the condition of [[agriculture]]. The basis of [[temple]] and [[court]] was [[agrarian]] in that their [[wealth]] and [[power]] presupposed chiefly arrangements concerning [[agricultural]] [[production]]. The [[market]] depended on [[agriculture]] less directly than did [[temple]] or [[court]], for the [[trader]]s brought [[goods]] from afar subject to other hazards than that of the [[local]] [[weather]], and (provided there were sufficient stored [[saving]]s) sold their [[goods]] in lean years as in fat. Yet, in the long run, the merchants too depended on the state of agriculture and their profits presupposed the peasants' surplus. Even when, as in Syria, mercantile city-states arose which depended primarily on distant trading by sea and land, their trade depended so intimately on the agrarian societies about them that both morally and materially they too lived ultimately from the peasants. Even the pastoralists, including the desert nomads, who depended on the agriculturists for much of their food and goods, were part of the same social complex. Accordingly, the type of social order which was introduced into the agricultural regions (and the areas dependent on them) with the rise of cities may be called agrarian-based or (to be more comprehensive) ''agrarianate citied society''. (I say 'citied', not 'urban', because the society included the peasants, who were not urban though their life reflected the presence of [[city|citie]]s.)<ref>{{:RefHodgson001}} s. 107.</ref>
+|All three foci of [[high culture]] depended on the condition of [[agriculture]]. The basis of [[temple]] and [[court]] was [[agrarian]] in that their [[wealth]] and [[power]] presupposed chiefly arrangements concerning [[agricultural]] [[production]]. The [[market]] depended on [[agriculture]] less directly than did [[temple]] or [[court]], for the [[trader]]s brought [[goods]] from afar subject to other hazards than that of the [[local]] [[weather]], and (provided there were sufficient stored [[saving]]s) sold their [[goods]] in lean years as in fat. Yet, in the [[long run]], the [[merchant]]s too depended on the state of [[agriculture]] and their [[profit]]s presupposed the [[peasant]]s' [[surplus]]. Even when, as in [[Syria]], [[mercantile]] [[city-states]] arose which depended primarily on distant [[trade|trad]]ing by [[sea]] and [[kara|land]], their [[trade]] depended so intimately on the [[agrarian society|agrarian societ]]ies about them that both [[morally]] and [[materially]] they too lived ultimately from the [[peasant]]s. Even the [[pastoralist]]s, including the [[desert]] [[nomad]]s, who depended on the [[agriculturist]]s for much of their [[food]] and [[goods]], were part of the same [[social complex]]. Accordingly, the type of [[social order]] which was introduced into the [[agricultural]] regions (and the areas dependent on them) with the rise of [[city|cit]]ies may be called [[agrarian-based]] or (to be more comprehensive) ''[[agrarianate citied society]]''. (I say '[[citied]]', not '[[urban]]', because the [[society]] included the [[peasant]]s, who were not [[urban]] though their [[life]] reflected the presence of [[city|citie]]s.)<ref>{{:RefHodgson001}} s. 107.</ref>
 |-
 |}