Osman 08.30, 14 Eylül 2009 tarihinde

2009-09-14T08:30:32Z

Osman: Yeni sayfa: {| border="1" |- |Descartes, perhaps following Plato, does insist that knowledge must meet two conditions: first, it must be of a real and independent object. We may feel headaches, for ...

2009-09-14T08:04:21Z

Yeni sayfa: {| border="1" |- |Descartes, perhaps following Plato, does insist that knowledge must meet two conditions: first, it must be of a real and independent object. We may feel headaches, for ...

Yeni sayfa

{| border="1"
|-
|Descartes, perhaps following Plato, does insist that knowledge must meet two conditions: first, it must be of a real and independent object. We may feel headaches, for example, but as they are, in his sense, dependent entities, they are not proper objects of knowledge. That is one reason mathematical entities are selected by him (and many others from Plato onward) as the only true objects of knowledge. They are objects that are both eternal and independent of us. Second, knowledge claims are infallible; if something is known, it is known to be true.<ref>;Richard H. Popkin (1999), "''René Descartes''", ''' The Columbia History of Western Philosophy''', New York: Columbia University Press, p. 340</ref>
|-
|}

@@ 1. satır: / 1. satır: @@
 {| border="1"
 |-
-|Descartes, perhaps following Plato, does insist that knowledge must meet two conditions: first, it must be of a real and independent object. We may feel headaches, for example, but as they are, in his sense, dependent entities, they are not proper objects of knowledge. That is one reason mathematical entities are selected by him (and many others from Plato onward) as the only true objects of knowledge. They are objects that are both eternal and independent of us. Second, knowledge claims are infallible; if something is known, it is known to be true.<ref>;Richard H. Popkin (1999), "''René Descartes''", ''' The Columbia History of Western Philosophy''', New York: Columbia University Press, p. 340</ref>
+|Descartes, perhaps following Plato, does insist that knowledge must meet two conditions: first, it must be of a real and independent object. We may feel headaches, for example, but as they are, in his sense, dependent entities, they are not proper objects of knowledge. That is one reason mathematical entities are selected by him (and many others from Plato onward) as the only true objects of knowledge. They are objects that are both eternal and independent of us. Second, knowledge claims are infallible; if something is known, it is known to be true.<ref>;Richard H. Popkin (1999), ''' The Columbia History of Western Philosophy''', New York: Columbia University Press, p. 340</ref>
 |-
 |}

Descartes:00011 - Revizyon geçmişi

Osman 08.30, 14 Eylül 2009 tarihinde

Osman: Yeni sayfa: {| border="1" |- |Descartes, perhaps following Plato, does insist that knowledge must meet two conditions: first, it must be of a real and independent object. We may feel headaches, for ...