Burke 000004 - Revizyon geçmişi

Osman 04.43, 7 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-07T04:43:08Z

Osman 04.15, 7 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-07T04:15:31Z

Osman 04.10, 7 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-07T04:10:35Z

Osman 04.08, 7 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-07T04:08:49Z

Osman: "{| border="1" |- |An important aspect of Hodgson's reevaluation of modernity is his insistence that in historical time it is the discontinuities and not the c..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

2021-10-03T10:27:14Z

"{| border="1" |- |An important aspect of Hodgson's reevaluation of modernity is his insistence that in historical time it is the discontinuities and not the c..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

Yeni sayfa

{| border="1"
|-
|An important aspect of Hodgson's reevaluation of modernity is his insistence that in historical time it is the discontinuities and not the continuities of Western history which are most striking. He notes that the ascending curve which runs from ancient Greece, to the Renaissance, to modern times is an optical illusion. In fact, he argues, for most of history Europe was an insignificant outlier of mainland Asia. Furthermore, he notes, the Renaissance did not inaugurate modernity. Instead, it brought Europe up to the cultural level of the other major civilizations of the Oikoumene. It did so in some measure by assimilating the advances of the other Asian civilizations. The list of inventions which developed elsewhere and diffused subsequently to Europe is a long one. It includes gunpowder firearms, the compass, the sternpost rudder, decimal notation, and the university, among others. Seen in this light, the European experience looks much less original. This is not to deny that there were original European developments. But in the context of three millennia of agrarianate citied life in the Afro-Eurasian Oikoumene, there was a tendency for civilizations to achieve a rough parity with one another as cultural innovations diffused throughout the Oikoumene.<ref>{{:RefBurke001}} s. xix-xx.</ref>
|-
|}

@@ 1. satır: / 1. satır: @@
 {| border="1"
 |-
-|An important aspect of [[Marshall G. S. Hodgson|Hodgson]]'s reevaluation of [[modernity]] is his insistence that in [[historical]] [[time]] it is the [[discontinuity|discontinuitie]]s and not the [[continuit|continuitie]]s of [[Western]] [[history]] which are most striking. He notes that the ascending curve which runs from [[ancient Greece]], to the [[Renaissance]], to [[modern times]] is an optical [[Illusion|illusion]]. In fact, he argues, for most of [[history]] [[Europe]] was an insignificant outlier of [[mainland Asia]]. Furthermore, he notes, the [[Renaissance]] did not inaugurate [[modernity]]. Instead, it brought [[Europe]] up to the [[cultural level]] of the other major [[civilization]]s of the [[Oikoumene]]. It did so in some measure by assimilating the advances of the other [[Asian]] [[civilization]]s. The list of [[invention]]s which developed elsewhere and diffused subsequently to [[Europe]] is a long one. It includes [[gunpowder]] [[firearm]]s, the [[compass]], the [[sternpost rudder]], [[decimal]] [[notation]], and the [[university]], among others. Seen in this light, the [[European]] experience looks much less original. This is not to deny that there were original [[European]] [[development]]s. But in the context of three millennia of [[agrarianate citied life]] in the [[Afro-Eurasian]] [[Oikoumene]], there was a [[tendency]] for [[civilization]]s to achieve a rough parity with one another as [[cultural]] [[innovation]]s diffused throughout the [[Oikoumene]].<ref>{{:RefBurke001}} s. xix-xx.</ref>
+|An important aspect of [[Marshall G. S. Hodgson|Hodgson]]'s reevaluation of [[modernity]] is his insistence that in [[historical]] [[time]] it is the [[discontinuity|discontinuitie]]s and not the [[continuit|continuitie]]s of [[Western]] [[history]] which are most striking. He notes that the ascending curve which runs from [[ancient Greece]], to the [[Renaissance]], to [[modern times]] is an optical [[Illusion|illusion]]. In fact, he argues, for most of [[history]] [[Europe]] was an insignificant outlier of [[mainland Asia]]. Furthermore, he notes, the [[Renaissance]] did not inaugurate [[modernity]]. Instead, it brought [[Europe]] up to the [[cultural level]] of the other major [[civilization]]s of the [[Oikoumene]]. It did so in some measure by assimilating the advances of the other [[Asian]] [[civilization]]s. The list of [[Invention|invention]]s which developed elsewhere and diffused subsequently to [[Europe]] is a long one. It includes [[gunpowder]] [[firearm]]s, the [[compass]], the [[sternpost rudder]], [[decimal]] [[notation]], and the [[university]], among others. Seen in this light, the [[European]] experience looks much less original. This is not to deny that there were original [[European]] [[development]]s. But in the context of three millennia of [[agrarianate citied life]] in the [[Afro-Eurasian]] [[Oikoumene]], there was a [[tendency]] for [[civilization]]s to achieve a rough parity with one another as [[cultural]] [[Innovation|innovation]]s diffused throughout the [[Oikoumene]].<ref>{{:RefBurke001}} s. xix-xx.</ref>
 |-
 |}