Burke 000002 - Revizyon geçmişi

Osman 10.06, 3 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-03T10:06:07Z

Osman 10.01, 3 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-03T10:01:48Z

Osman 09.38, 3 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-03T09:38:17Z

Osman 09.22, 3 Ekim 2021 tarihinde

2021-10-03T09:22:06Z

Osman: "{| border="1" |- |As a result of the collapse of the sense of moral exceptionalism which had privileged the West above the rest of [[humanity]..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

2021-10-03T09:19:53Z

"{| border="1" |- |As a result of the collapse of the sense of moral exceptionalism which had privileged the West above the rest of [[humanity]..." içeriğiyle yeni sayfa oluşturdu

Yeni sayfa

{| border="1"
|-
|As a result of the [[collapse]] of the sense of [[moral]] [[exceptionalism]] which had privileged the [[West]] above the rest of [[humanity]] as well as a new sense of [[global]] [[Interdependency|interdependency]], [[historian]]s have expanded their focus.<ref>{{:RefBurke001}} s. ix.</ref>
|-
|}

@@ 1. satır: / 1. satır: @@
 {| border="1"
 |-
-|Both [[orientalism]] and [[Western civilization]] begin in the [[textualist]] position that [[civilization]]s have [[essence]]s, and that these [[essence]]s are best seen in the [[Great Book]]s they have produced. (Who decides what's a [[Great Book]], or what connection it might have to the lived lives of [[insan|men and women]] in particular [[place]]s and [[time]]s is never satisfactorily explained.) The [[textualist]] position foreshortens [[history]], annihilates change, and levels difference the better to represent an image of the [[past] in [[dramatic]] form – either as [[tragedy]], as in the case of [[Islamic civilization]], or as [[triumph]], as in the case of the rise of the [[West]]. In either case, it is a [[story]] whose [[rhythm]]s are guided by the [[Ineluctable|ineluctable]] working out of civilizational [[essence]]s allegedly encoded in foundation texts. Thus we get the [[history]] of the [[West]] as the [[story]] of [[freedom]] and [[rationality]], or the [[history]] of the [[East]] (pick an East, any East) as the [[story]] of [[despotism]] and [[cultural]] [[stasis]].<ref>{{:RefBurke001}} s. xv.</ref>
+|Both [[orientalism]] and [[Western civilization]] begin in the [[textualist]] position that [[civilization]]s have [[essence]]s, and that these [[essence]]s are best seen in the [[Great Book]]s they have produced. (Who decides what's a [[Great Book]], or what connection it might have to the lived lives of [[insan|men and women]] in particular [[place]]s and [[time]]s is never satisfactorily explained.) The [[textualist]] position foreshortens [[history]], annihilates change, and levels difference the better to represent an image of the [[past]] in [[dramatic]] form – either as [[tragedy]], as in the case of [[Islamic civilization]], or as [[triumph]], as in the case of the rise of the [[West]]. In either case, it is a [[story]] whose [[rhythm]]s are guided by the [[Ineluctable|ineluctable]] working out of civilizational [[essence]]s allegedly encoded in foundation texts. Thus we get the [[history]] of the [[West]] as the [[story]] of [[freedom]] and [[rationality]], or the [[history]] of the [[East]] (pick an East, any East) as the [[story]] of [[despotism]] and [[cultural]] [[stasis]].<ref>{{:RefBurke001}} s. xv.</ref>
 |-
 |}